MAKØK 2, blok 1, 2015

Errata to Lecture Notes

(continuously updated)       

12/9 2015   
Ch. 2, p. 28, line 5-3 from below:    Should read:

Indeed, from the mean value theorem <footnote> we know that for any k > 0 there exists a number a ∈(0,1) such that f '(ak) = (f(k) - f(0))/k. For this a we thus have f(k) - f '(ak)k =f(0) < f(k)-f '(k)k, where the inequality follows from f '(ak) > f '(k), by f ' ' < 0. In view of ...

Ch. 3, p. 73, line 1:    "By continuity of U(t), it follows"    should read    "By continuity of dU(t)/dt, it follows".
    -    -        , line 11 from below:    "r_t+1 more units"    should read    "1 + r_t +1 more units".
    -    -        , line 9 from below:    "r_t+1 units"    should read    "1 + r_t +1 units".
    -   , p. 76, line 15:    "... as young, and thus saving, happens"    should read    "... as young - and thus saving - happens".
    -   , p. 84, DEF 1, line 3:    "and for all t = 0, 1, 2, ... , (3.27) has"    should read    ", satisfies (3.27), and for all t = 0, 1, 2, ..., has". 

13/9
Ch. 3, p. 82, n. 12, line 2:    "will not"    should read    "will generally not".    
    -   , p. 96, line 5 from below:    delete the text.

17/9
Ch. 3, p. 90, Lemma 2, line 1:    After the comma add:    "For all k_t > 0"    should read    "For all k_t > 0 for which dk_t+1/dk_t is defined".
    -   , p. 99, Proposition 4, line 4: Before "Oscillations do not occur" add "If k_t does not converge to k*, k_t converges to another steady state."
    -   , p. 99, Proof, line 4:    Delete "By Lemma 4 the roof then does the same." (not because it is wrong, but because it has no role in the proof).
    -    -    -  , Proof, line 9:    After "stable." add "If k_t does not converge to k*, k_t converges to one of the other steady states. Indeed, divergence is ruled out since, by Lemma 5, there exists k_bar > 0 such that w(k)/(1+n) < k_bar for all k > k_bar (Fig. 3.7 illustrates).

19/9
Ch. 4, p. 130, line 6 from below:    Relocate "Assume (1 + g)/(1 + n) > 1 - d. Then:"  to  p. 131, line 1, right after "(ii)".
    -    , p. 136, line 13 from below:    Replace ". That is, given these ...... and so"  with  ", and that, if there exist several steady states,".
    -    , p. 136, line 12 from below:    Replace "in a steady state"    with    "in one of them".

24/9
Ch. 6, p. 219, line 3 from below:    "it can not"    should read    "the tax revenue aimed at can not".
    -  
, p. 222, line 10:    "because lending"    should read    "because borrowing".
    -   , p. 238, line 13:    "(13.68)"    should read    "(6.25)".
    -        -      , line 15:    "(13.67)"    should read    "(6.24)".
    -        -      , line 20:    "(13.69)"    should read    "(6.26)".

1/10
Ch. 9, p. 370, line 7:    "takes the form of"    should read    "is".

9/10
Ch. 9, p. 364:    Replace line 13-16 by "only if their net debt does not exceed the present value of future primary saving. Denoting by d_o net debt at time 0, i.e., d_o ≡ - a_o, the solvency requirement as seen from time 0 is".

Ch. 11, p. 440-442:    T should be replaced by a Calligraphic T.

19/10
Ch. 11, p. 443, line 3:    "the future, and ..."    should read    "the future. And ...".   
    -        -       , line 4:    "the future. The shift ..."    should read    "the future, the shift ...".

25/10
Ch. 14, p. 607, line 2:    Before "Text not yet available." should be added "The divergent paths can be shown to violate the transversality condition of the firm."   

Note 2, s. 3, line 5:    " , = "     should read    " = ".

 


Back